Followed through Back danger, President Trump has vetoed the $ 740 million National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), a major bill that allocates military funds every year.
In a tweet earlier this month, Trump said that if he would sink the NDAA to include “terminating” the language, Section 230 of the Communications Communications Act, a necessary and previously obscure Internet law that the president put in his crosshairs For the better part of the year.
Trump said, “Your failure to eliminate the very dangerous national security risk of Section 230 makes our intelligence impossible and it is impossible for everyone to know what we are doing.” Statement On veto. It is unclear what the president meant, or what he was referring to criticizing the Military Money Bill as a “gift” to China and Russia.
The president cited a “bipartisan call” for Section 230 in his decision, notwithstanding the NDAA’s overwhelming bipartisan support in Congress and the fact that the Section 230 reform was never seriously considered in an unreliable military spending bill. Trump also claimed that Section 230 “facilitates the proliferation of online foreign divestment,” a threat to the president, which often occurs Spreads dangerous misinformation onlineHas historically expressed little concern for this.
Section 230 became a hot topic in 2020 as lawmakers, states and the federal government took major steps to rein in the tech industry’s largest, most powerful companies. The law protects Internet companies from liability for the content they host and is widely credited with opening doors for Internet companies intended to grow their online businesses over the years, big and small.
In search of leverage on technology platforms flashing his content, Trump zeroed in on Section 230 – And Twitter in particular – Earlier this year. In May, the President signed Toothless on an unusual but large scale executive Order Attack on Tech’s Liability Shield. “When Twitter wants to make edits, it is easy to select, blacklist, cinematographic editorial decisions, pure and simple,” Trump said.
Trump’s position on Section 230 and the NDAA was never particularly notable. While the NDAA is a huge piece of legislation, the repeal of Section 230 was never on the table in some way to change the way many disparate things roll. The unpopularity of the position the President has held here is also difficult to end. The NDAA funded several parts of the military beyond the war and this year’s bill includes salary increases for soldiers and additional health support for Vietnam veterans.
Trump’s views on Section 230 are equally extreme, even relative to many other members of his party. While there is support for changing Section 230 on both sides of the aisle, Congress is far from consensus on what needs to be changed and done Complex bipartisan reform effort It is going on. The end result of the kind of reforms that Congress is coming up with in the coming year is very unlikely to completely throw out Section 230.
The House on Monday planned to end the president’s exercise of veto powers, an effort that would require a two-thirds majority in both houses of Congress. The House approved the NDAA earlier this month with a veto-proof 355–78 vote, which included widespread support from the vast majority of House Republicans. Senate passed legislation with President Likewise the strong Bipartisan 84-13 vote. December 11 in favor of the bill.